Mark's inconsistent argument deranged us all. 马克前后矛盾的争辩困扰了我们大家。
So if you negate that conclusion and took away the therefore, if you negated that conclusion the set would be inconsistent wouldn't it? and that shows you that that's a valid argument. 如果你否认结论,把所以拿掉,那么,如果你否认结论,这就不一致了,不是吗?这显示这是一个有效论点。
However, if we only investigate and hypothesize the inconsistent phenomenon of the ideological content and artistic achievements from the perspective of literature, but could not come up with reliable evidences to support this argument, the conjectural conclusion can only be a possibility. 但如果仅从文学的角度去考察和推测思想内容与艺术成就的断层现象,而无法拿出可靠的证据来支持这一论点,这种推测的结论也只能是一种可能。